Re: [sup-talk] Choosing a bug tracker for Sup

From: Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com>
To: William Morgan <wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net>
Cc: sup-talk <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>
Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Choosing a bug tracker for Sup
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:23:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1257193412-sup-5939@peray> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1257189278-sup-7991@masanjin.net>

Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Mon Nov 02 20:20:32 +0100 2009:
> Reformatted excerpts from Nicolas Pouillard's message of 2009-11-02:
> > Right, we want short issue numbers. I'm would still be a bit sad of
> > completely loosing the distributed property. Maybe a solution would be
> > to allow issues to have an optional short name. In practice it will be
> > just temporarily, the time the issue makes its way to the central
> > repository, or being just a local issue.
> 
> I just think it would be really useful to say stuff like "this is a
> duplicate of #154" or "fixing this depends on index-48" or whatever, and
> have everyone be able to find that easily, e.g. by going to
> http://sup.com/bugs/index-48. Having to refer to the hashes in Ditz was
> irritating.

I agree, that's way I proposed it.

-- 
Nicolas Pouillard
http://nicolaspouillard.fr
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk