From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.117.16 with SMTP id p16cs487986agc; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:31:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.8.84 with SMTP id g20mr3071435qag.306.1257190260410; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:31:00 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 27si7466634qyk.123.2009.11.02.11.31.00; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:31:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED6E3C8061; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:31:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3872C1858291 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:20:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N52S9-0005Ls-QC for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:20:33 -0800 From: William Morgan To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1257183536-sup-1174@peray> References: <1257111816-sup-4397@peray> <1257169654-sup-6224@masanjin.net> <1257183536-sup-1174@peray> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:20:32 -0800 Message-Id: <1257189278-sup-7991@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Choosing a bug tracker for Sup X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from Nicolas Pouillard's message of 2009-11-02: > Right, we want short issue numbers. I'm would still be a bit sad of > completely loosing the distributed property. Maybe a solution would be > to allow issues to have an optional short name. In practice it will be > just temporarily, the time the issue makes its way to the central > repository, or being just a local issue. I just think it would be really useful to say stuff like "this is a duplicate of #154" or "fixing this depends on index-48" or whatever, and have everyone be able to find that easily, e.g. by going to http://sup.com/bugs/index-48. Having to refer to the hashes in Ditz was irritating. -- William _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk