From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.117.16 with SMTP id p16cs470615agc; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 07:58:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.50.11 with SMTP id x11mr2938369qaf.248.1257177533209; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:58:53 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 40si7660262qyk.74.2009.11.02.07.58.53; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:58:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EFC1678316; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:58:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A1F1588063 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:58:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N4zIr-00027f-2x for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:58:45 -0800 From: William Morgan To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1256199860-sup-4407@thinkpad-ubuntu> References: <1256199860-sup-4407@thinkpad-ubuntu> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:58:45 -0800 Message-Id: <1257177490-sup-4126@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Completion for search queries X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from Christopher Bertels's message of 2009-10-22: > Anyone else who would like to have this feature in sup? Sounds good to me. Probably wouldn't be too hard since we have a fairly general tab-completion mechanism in place already. -- William _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk