From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.117.16 with SMTP id p16cs465775agc; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:55:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.126.209 with SMTP id d17mr2883113qas.263.1257173758283; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:55:58 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 34si7367576qyk.25.2009.11.02.06.55.58; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:55:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BCD1598078; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:55:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D81B1588062 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:53:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N4yHM-000145-UR for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:53:08 -0800 From: William Morgan To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1257143690-sup-7839@tilus.net> References: <1257111816-sup-4397@peray> <1257143690-sup-7839@tilus.net> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:53:08 -0800 Message-Id: <1257173444-sup-295@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Choosing a bug tracker for Sup X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from Tero Tilus's message of 2009-11-01: > Requirement: Bug submission by email? > I'd say we need that. That's what we have now, basically, and what we had when we were using ditz, and I didn't like having to do the extra work of making an issue. > This is pretty traditional. I'd still want to challenge a bit. Why > do we need severity and priority? What would they be used for? At least one type of ordering would be nice. There are a large class of feature requests where my basic feeling is "sure, that would be nice, but I've got a million other things more important to do", which I would like to keep around as food for later thought, if nothing else, but would like to basically ignore in the near term. -- William _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk