Re: [sup-talk] Choosing a bug tracker for Sup

From: William Morgan <wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net>
To: sup-talk <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>
Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Choosing a bug tracker for Sup
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:53:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1257173444-sup-295@masanjin.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1257143690-sup-7839@tilus.net>

Reformatted excerpts from Tero Tilus's message of 2009-11-01:
> Requirement: Bug submission by email?
> I'd say we need that.

That's what we have now, basically, and what we had when we were using
ditz, and I didn't like having to do the extra work of making an issue.

> This is pretty traditional.  I'd still want to challenge a bit.  Why
> do we need severity and priority?  What would they be used for?

At least one type of ordering would be nice. There are a large class of
feature requests where my basic feeling is "sure, that would be nice,
but I've got a million other things more important to do", which I would
like to keep around as food for later thought, if nothing else, but
would like to basically ignore in the near term.
-- 
William <wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net>
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk