From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.117.16 with SMTP id p16cs456684agc; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 04:15:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.117.12 with SMTP id o12mr2830923qaq.57.1257164128725; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:15:28 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 42si7292040qyk.132.2009.11.02.04.15.28; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:15:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D56B18582D3; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 07:15:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED58B18582C5 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2009 07:13:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N4vmP-0006vj-NG for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:13:01 -0800 From: William Morgan To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1256280223-sup-736@tilus.net> References: <1254353101-sup-1021@thinkpad-ubuntu> <1254415145-sup-635@masanjin.net> <1254420802-sup-3742@thinkpad-ubuntu> <1254421405-sup-8083@masanjin.net> <1254442420-sup-3771@thinkpad-ubuntu> <1254487575-sup-5468@thinkpad-ubuntu> <1256280223-sup-736@tilus.net> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:13:01 -0800 Message-Id: <1257163967-sup-5554@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] i18n? X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from Tero Tilus's message of 2009-10-23: > Why not default to the english strings as translation keys and > fallback to key itself in case of missing translation? Christopher, what do you think? -- William _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk