From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.117.16 with SMTP id p16cs415500agc; Sun, 1 Nov 2009 09:56:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.90.70 with SMTP id h6mr2311922qam.300.1257098200547; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 09:56:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 27si6422660qyk.55.2009.11.01.09.56.40; Sun, 01 Nov 2009 09:56:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D54F16782B2; Sun, 1 Nov 2009 12:56:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA61E185826F for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2009 12:49:11 -0500 (EST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,662,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="35963867" Received: from peray.inria.fr (HELO localhost) ([128.93.8.98]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2009 18:49:11 +0100 From: Nicolas Pouillard To: William Morgan In-reply-to: <1257096395-sup-2011@masanjin.net> References: <1256749942-sup-4831@arrakis.es.net> <1256760295-sup-9873@peray> <1256760970-sup-8118@arrakis.es.net> <1256939476-sup-2864@masanjin.net> <1256987483-sup-338@tilus.net> <1257086191-sup-1136@masanjin.net> <1257088992-sup-5165@peray> <1257091305-sup-4606@masanjin.net> <1257093429-sup-8020@peray> <1257096395-sup-2011@masanjin.net> Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:49:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1257097118-sup-8031@peray> User-Agent: Sup/git Cc: sup-talk Subject: Re: [sup-talk] [PATCH] minor nits in exception apology message X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Sun Nov 01 18:30:04 +0100 2009: > Reformatted excerpts from Nicolas Pouillard's message of 2009-11-01: > > What I found cool about distributed bugtrackers is that the > > bug-closing action can follow the code that fixes the bug. Being in a > > branch, or being reviewed... > > > > About non-technical users, I think that just a mail (thread) on the > > mailing-list could suffice. Of course some web app can make things > > clearer. > > It's funny, the two things that I found irritating do were a) close the > bug as part of the commit (because I kept forgetting, and also because I > like reading commits with git log -p and the ditz stuff was additional > noise), and I think some habits are needed in each model... > b) translating a user's bug report email into an issue. :) Yes this translating job can really be boring. In fact I consider every bugtracker related task to be boring... And yes the nice part of web based bugtracker is to put this burden on the user. -- Nicolas Pouillard http://nicolaspouillard.fr _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk