From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.117.16 with SMTP id p16cs319290agc; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:53:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.63.202 with SMTP id c10mr1328976qai.39.1256939632539; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:53:52 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 5si4944661qyk.5.2009.10.30.14.53.52; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:53:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EEED1588071; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:53:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from entry.masanjin.net (masanjin.net [209.20.72.13]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7480F1588069 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:53:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from w by entry.masanjin.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N3zPA-0006s6-Cy for sup-talk@rubyforge.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:53:08 -0700 From: William Morgan To: sup-talk In-reply-to: <1256760970-sup-8118@arrakis.es.net> References: <1256749942-sup-4831@arrakis.es.net> <1256760295-sup-9873@peray> <1256760970-sup-8118@arrakis.es.net> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:53:08 -0700 Message-Id: <1256939476-sup-2864@masanjin.net> User-Agent: Sup/git Subject: Re: [sup-talk] [PATCH] minor nits in exception apology message X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Reformatted excerpts from Jon Dugan's message of 2009-10-28: > I was wondering about that. It seemed odd to me to be obfuscating the email > address at all in this context since this is an error message not a webpage. Yep, it was intentional. As Nicolas points out, the error message is often copied-and-pasted, and the source code is indexable via Gitorious. The change for BASE_DIR is great though. If you remove the obfuscation I will accept the patch. > In my mind the usability enhancement of being able to cut and paste > the email address would increase the likelyhood of people reporting > errors. I hate people reporting errors. I should actually change that whole thing to suggest they to send a bugfix patch. -- William _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk