From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: by 10.90.73.7 with SMTP id v7cs42173aga;
        Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.126.209 with SMTP id d17mr2113743qas.263.1254603842314;
        Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org>
Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 36si4326664qyk.92.2009.10.03.14.04.02;
        Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org
Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1])
	by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C50185828C;
	Sat,  3 Oct 2009 17:04:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20])
	by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F20EB1779936
	for <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>; Sat,  3 Oct 2009 16:49:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Oct 2009 20:49:53 -0000
Received: from mawercer.at.xencon.net (EHLO mail.gmx.net) [83.246.111.127]
	by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 03 Oct 2009 22:49:53 +0200
X-Authenticated: #9006135
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+3J55MROa3/6Nk1AK6OgnLXX9YxDdKpMgnB7wvu/
	OyNP/U0GftFi8J
Received: by mail.gmx.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
	Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:49:40 +0200
From: Marc Weber <marco-oweber@gmx.de>
To: sup-talk <sup-talk@rubyforge.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:49:40 +0200
Message-Id: <1254602805-sup-2900@nixos>
User-Agent: Sup/git
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.64
Subject: [sup-talk] next search in buffer view..
X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup <sup-talk.rubyforge.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://rubyforge.org/mailman/options/sup-talk>,
	<mailto:sup-talk-request@rubyforge.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk>
List-Post: <mailto:sup-talk@rubyforge.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sup-talk-request@rubyforge.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk>,
	<mailto:sup-talk-request@rubyforge.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org
Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org


buffer.rb

  def handle_input c
    if @focus_buf
      if @focus_buf.mode.in_search? && c != CONTINUE_IN_BUFFER_SEARCH_KEY[0]
        @focus_buf.mode.cancel_search!
        @focus_buf.mark_dirty
      end
      @focus_buf.mode.handle_input c
    end
  end

Why is the search canceled when typing any other char?

That's really annoying because there are some mails I have to use the
same search multiple times. However I also have to scroll up /down to
see enough context.

So why has this been implemented? Is it safe to remove that if
statement?
Seems to work for me.


It would be better if the next search would continue from the current
line rather than the last search result.

I'd like to see 'N' (search backward) as well.

If you like these ideas I'm going to supply a patch.

Comments?

Marc Weber
_______________________________________________
sup-talk mailing list
sup-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk