From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: wirtwolff@gmail.com (Wirt Wolff)
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 09:17:18 -0600
Subject: [sup-talk] [PATCH] Add 'a' and 'd' keybindings to
	thread-view-mode to archive/delete current thread
In-Reply-To: <1252000831-sup-9922@masanjin.net>
References: <1251325542-sup-3105@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<1252000831-sup-9922@masanjin.net>
Message-ID: <1252422961-sup-9843@chigamba>

Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Thu Sep 03 12:06:55 -0600 2009:
> Reformatted excerpts from Carl Worth's message of 2009-08-26:
> > These behave identically to the existing ",a" and ",d" commands, (that
> > is they archive or delete the current thread and then view the next).
>
> Sorry it's taken me so long to look at this. Thanks for the patch!
>
> I'm curious what other people think about this. On the one hand, it's
> only additional keybindings, so it's not going to adversely affect
> anyone. On the other hand, there is a nice balance with the ".", ","
> and "]" commands which this disrupts, and it can't be extended to the
> other commands from thread-index-mode. And on the third hand, I'm happy
> to have keybinding hooks.
>
> I guess if most people primarily closes their thread-view-modes using
> ",a" and ",d", then I'm fine with this.

Don't mind having 'a' and 'd' around, but likely won't use them.
Generally I pass down index with &, A, S, etc. occaisionally reading
high priority thread, then ]n, ]a etc. back up in thread view.

--
wmw