From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net (William Morgan) Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 05:25:50 -0700 Subject: [sup-talk] [PATCH] Identify list messages by list-id if list-post is not present In-Reply-To: <1252363563-sup-1774@elly> References: <1251192579-sup-1849@elly> <1251773879-sup-5227@masanjin.net> <1251794935-sup-3802@elly> <1252072500-sup-8128@masanjin.net> <1252363563-sup-1774@elly> Message-ID: <1252412603-sup-9617@masanjin.net> Reformatted excerpts from Israel Herraiz's message of 2009-09-07: > Umm. Yes, you are right. It fails because there is no list > address. Let me figure out another solution for this, I will send > another patch to the list. We need to figure out what the right behavior should be when replying to a message that you know is a list message, but where you don't know the list address. If there's a reliable way of extracting the list address from another header (From?), we can use that, but I suspect there isn't. If there isn't a reliable wa, then maybe the original behavior is fine (don't treat it specially at all). -- William