From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ingmar@exherbo.org (Ingmar Vanhassel)
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:07:27 +0200
Subject: [sup-talk] [PATCH 0/18] Xapian-based index
In-Reply-To: <1248713376-sup-5163@cannonball>
References: <1245531017-9907-1-git-send-email-rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu>
	<1245854803-sup-4481@entry> <1245864733-sup-1216@entry>
	<loom.20090625T222159-861@post.gmane.org>
	<1246022094-sup-3336@entry> <1247873980-sup-8574@wrasse>
	<20090723102325.GA4291@chistera.yi.org>
	<1248497184-sup-939@pion.club.cc.cmu.edu>
	<1248513425-sup-2484@chistera.yi.org>
	<1248550384-sup-74@pion.club.cc.cmu.edu>
	<1248709681-sup-4141@entry> <1248713376-sup-5163@cannonball>
Message-ID: <1251792282-sup-2057@cannonball>

Excerpts from Ingmar Vanhassel's message of Mon Jul 27 18:56:28 +0200 2009:
> Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Mon Jul 27 17:48:38 +0200 2009:
> > Reformatted excerpts from Rich Lane's message of 2009-07-25:
> > > One issue I've noticed is that removing labels from messages doesn't
> > > always immediately work.
> > 
> > Is this true even after you sync changes to the index? What about if you
> > reload the label list buffer? ('@')
> 
> It's true in both cases. Even after a sync, 'U' still produces read
> messages (among unread), and a search for label:foo has threads without
> that label. If you quit sup & restart it things work as expected for a
> while.

I can still reproduce this for a more specific case, with xapian 1.0.15.

Searching for is:unread (hit U), works as expected. When I filter
that with threads having a second label (hit |, label:foo), then it
shows threads with label:foo, but it loses the is:unread constraint.

Same for immediately doing is:unread label:foo, which gives me unread
threads, but not always with the foo label.
-- 
Exherbo KDE, X.org maintainer