From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bwalton@artsci.utoronto.ca (Ben Walton) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:42:21 -0400 Subject: [sup-talk] [PATCH] index log In-Reply-To: <1251691269-sup-246@zyrg.net> References: <1250491123-19240-1-git-send-email-rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu> <1250948551-sup-2052@masanjin.net> <1251116226-sup-1373@peray> <1251691269-sup-246@zyrg.net> Message-ID: <1251718898-sup-2772@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from Rich Lane's message of Mon Aug 31 00:16:03 -0400 2009: > What do people think about replacing the current undo system with one > based on the label log? This would only be possible once we have > immediate label changes. I think it would simplify a lot of code. +1 for this. I find that more often than not, undo doesn't work as expected anyway. It's been suggested that this is a threading bug, which is quite likely... -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: