From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net (William Morgan) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:39:57 -0700 Subject: [sup-talk] some internal api refactors In-Reply-To: <1250461358-sup-7209@zyrg.net> References: <1250021119-sup-4253@masanjin.net> <1250054282-sup-9053@pion.club.cc.cmu.edu> <1250459019-sup-6390@masanjin.net> <1250461358-sup-7209@zyrg.net> Message-ID: <1250537445-sup-4504@masanjin.net> Reformatted excerpts from Rich Lane's message of 2009-08-16: > The ThreadSet still needs the ref to do the UI-level threading, right? > Making it another API call is good as long as that's still taken care > of. I'm thinking about moving in the direction where the index is also responsible for threading (so maybe "index" is not the right term anymore), so the ThreadSet would just be a static representation of the thread structure of a set of messages as returned by the index. We'll see how it develops. -- William