From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu (Rich Lane)
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:49:24 -0400
Subject: [sup-talk] some internal api refactors
In-Reply-To: <1250459019-sup-6390@masanjin.net>
References: <1250021119-sup-4253@masanjin.net>
	<1250054282-sup-9053@pion.club.cc.cmu.edu>
	<1250459019-sup-6390@masanjin.net>
Message-ID: <1250461358-sup-7209@zyrg.net>

Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Sun Aug 16 17:44:49 -0400 2009:
> Reformatted excerpts from Rich Lane's message of 2009-08-11:
> > It's worth noting that update_message_state needs to handle modified
> > refs and snippets as well as labels. Maybe add a comment about this in
> > BaseIndex?
> 
> Different snippet, definitely. Good point. Modified refs: I'm tempted to
> replace this with another API call, since we don't really care about the
> refs; we just want the index to thread the messages together. Thoughts?

The ThreadSet still needs the ref to do the UI-level threading, right?
Making it another API call is good as long as that's still taken care of.