From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ezyang@MIT.EDU (Edward Z. Yang)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:18:46 -0400
Subject: [sup-talk] Sup annoyances
In-Reply-To: <1244569129-sup-4112@entry>
References: <1244270435-sup-9288@javelin> <1244481844-sup-9094@entry>
	<1244502545-sup-9840@javelin> <1244503985-sup-8587@entry>
	<1244506405-sup-5117@javelin> <1244514081-sup-2943@javelin>
	<1244514851-sup-1414@javelin> <1244569129-sup-4112@entry>
Message-ID: <1244690240-sup-884@javelin>

Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Tue Jun 09 13:40:38 -0400 2009:
> Not entirely sure what you mean by "having all the threads present", but
> opening a thread-view-mode buffer doesn't block on anything, at least
> with that patch applied. Without the patch, it blocks on loading the
> message body for every message in that particular thread from the
> server.

Yeah. I mean what I mean: it *shouldn't* block on anything, but as
far as I can tell from manual testing, thread-view-mode doesn't open
up until I'm done threading the index.  Maybe that's why.

Cheers,
Edward