* [sup-talk] utf patch needs work, i think
@ 2009-05-28 19:32 Ben Walton
2009-05-28 23:32 ` Ben Walton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Walton @ 2009-05-28 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
I just found something funny with the new utf patch. The only thing I
noticed in the headers of relevance was:
To: =?utf-16be?b?/v8AfgA6ACcAJwAgMEIwijBMMGgwRjBUMFYwRDB+MFcA?=
=?utf-16be?b?MF8wAg==?= <j.chetwynd at btinternet.com>
The displayed mail can be seen here:
http://www.cquest.utoronto.ca/u/bwalton/utf-wtf.png
I'll save the message if it's of any use in debugging the problem (it
was a post to the git list). There wasn't anything in the body itself
that looked odd to my quick visual inspection.
Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302
GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu
Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20090528/eec38321/attachment.bin>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [sup-talk] utf patch needs work, i think
2009-05-28 19:32 [sup-talk] utf patch needs work, i think Ben Walton
@ 2009-05-28 23:32 ` Ben Walton
2009-05-31 0:59 ` William Morgan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Walton @ 2009-05-28 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
Excerpts from Ben Walton's message of Thu May 28 15:32:42 -0400 2009:
>
> I just found something funny with the new utf patch. The only thing I
> noticed in the headers of relevance was:
>
> To: =?utf-16be?b?/v8AfgA6ACcAJwAgMEIwijBMMGgwRjBUMFYwRDB+MFcA?=
> =?utf-16be?b?MF8wAg==?= <j.chetwynd at btinternet.com>
...a followup on the list makes me wonder if this isn't actually a sup
thing, but a weird encoding 'joke' by the poster. Even if the body
display wasn't a sup bug, the name is still munged up.
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302
GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu
Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20090528/fc984a86/attachment.bin>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [sup-talk] utf patch needs work, i think
2009-05-28 23:32 ` Ben Walton
@ 2009-05-31 0:59 ` William Morgan
2009-06-02 14:54 ` William Morgan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: William Morgan @ 2009-05-31 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
Reformatted excerpts from Ben Walton's message of 2009-05-28:
> ...a followup on the list makes me wonder if this isn't actually a sup
> thing, but a weird encoding 'joke' by the poster. Even if the body
> display wasn't a sup bug, the name is still munged up.
I have the same message. I'll play around with it... I suspect there's
something like a tab or a weird character coming out of the decoding
(which appears to be some non-utf16 text claiming a utf16 big-endian
encoding) that is screwing with Ncurses.
--
William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [sup-talk] utf patch needs work, i think
2009-05-31 0:59 ` William Morgan
@ 2009-06-02 14:54 ` William Morgan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: William Morgan @ 2009-06-02 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
Reformatted excerpts from William Morgan's message of 2009-05-30:
> I suspect there's something like a tab or a weird character coming out
> of the decoding (which appears to be some non-utf16 text claiming a
> utf16 big-endian encoding) that is screwing with Ncurses.
I've committed some changes that should remove invalid characters
for your encoding before display. I think this should help. Also
various display tweaks to account for multibyte characters. I still
see some inconsistencies but I think it's getting better.
That message renders "fine" for me now. (A bunch of nonsense Chinese
characters mixed with some boxes.) I'm using utf8 in a gnome-terminal.
--
William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-02 14:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-28 19:32 [sup-talk] utf patch needs work, i think Ben Walton
2009-05-28 23:32 ` Ben Walton
2009-05-31 0:59 ` William Morgan
2009-06-02 14:54 ` William Morgan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox