From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bwalton@artsci.utoronto.ca (Ben Walton) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:05:09 -0400 Subject: [sup-talk] [PATCH] Use terminal width instead of hardcoded 80 as the wrap length. In-Reply-To: <1243439667-sup-3947@entry> References: <1243102667-sup-6007@r50p> <4c4248150905231318kab3819dw68e3a3a614241c0d@mail.gmail.com> <1243123134-sup-8032@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> <1243439667-sup-3947@entry> Message-ID: <1243440258-sup-7690@ntdws12.chass.utoronto.ca> Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Wed May 27 11:58:23 -0400 2009: > Seems like there are three main modes of operation that would be > desirable: > > 1. wrap at 80 chars; > 2. wrap at current terminal width; > 3. don't wrap. > > (In all cases, existing line breaks in the message are left alone.) > > Would a three-way toggle irritate anyone? Yes, for the message itself, this would work just fine. I'm ok with the toggle too. For the header display though, the terminal width should be honoured, I think. Thanks -Ben -- Ben Walton Systems Programmer - CHASS University of Toronto C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302 GPG Key Id: 8E89F6D2; Key Server: pgp.mit.edu Contact me to arrange for a CAcert assurance meeting. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: