From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net (William Morgan) Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 09:22:45 -0700 Subject: [sup-talk] Sup with Microsoft Exchange 2007 In-Reply-To: References: <3f81a4240904140559ubd286a5x2f026d6b875dd091@mail.gmail.com> <1240318807-sup-3080@entry> <3f81a4240904210642o9c74049o27e164e317d0842e@mail.gmail.com> <1240323082-sup-1515@entry> <3f81a4240904210729h74ac436bn9e1140cf7021c5ad@mail.gmail.com> <3f81a4240904210732k11366cf7naec562af54ecabac@mail.gmail.com> <1241045035-sup-1534@entry> <1241441484-sup-8964@entry> Message-ID: <1241453755-sup-6000@entry> Reformatted excerpts from Ben Walton's message of 2009-05-04: > Scan both folders (cur/, new/) on startup or sup-sync. After that, > scan only new. Since mail is moved out of new/ into cur/ after > detection, the time stamp stuff could be dropped since it would be > redundant anyway. Crap, I think you're right. Polling will be trivial and no more messing around with timestamps. In fact I don't even have to scan cur/ on startup; I can just assume it's unchanged. If you screw with the Maildir via another MUA you have to run sup-sync --changed, just like with every other source. For this to work, the "offset" for each message will have to be its filename. I wonder how many implicit assumptions that will violate. -- William