From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sgoldman@tower-research.com (Steve Goldman) Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 09:46:35 -0400 Subject: [sup-talk] Inconsistent inbox after restart In-Reply-To: <1241443759-sup-9889@entry> References: <1240945125-sup-8484@sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com> <1241028590-sup-8155@entry> <1241075456-sup-909@h984274.serverkompetenz.net> <1241095872-sup-9569@sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com> <1241098531-sup-1508@entry> <1241101364-sup-9621@sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com> <1241209146-sup-3561@sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com> <1241443759-sup-9889@entry> Message-ID: <1241444694-sup-9120@sgoldmanlinux.tower-research.com> Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Mon May 04 09:32:04 -0400 2009: > Reformatted excerpts from Steve Goldman's message of 2009-05-01: > > I have found the offensive commit... > > Interesting. I think I see the problem. Were all the messages that > magically reappeared in your inbox messages that were sent to mailing > lists, or otherwise messages that somehow appeared twice in your inbox? Most of the messages I archive come from lists, so this is possible. The lists I'm on are smart enough to not deliver messages twice, most of the time. > > (And for all you perl bashers out there, given this ridiculous line > > of ruby, you officially can't talk any more shit.) > > No one here has bashed Perl. Personally I prefer bashing Python (when > I'm not too busy bashing Java (when I'm not too busy bashing C++)), and > credit Perl for much of what I like about Ruby. Live and let live!! -- Steve Goldman sgoldman at tower-research.com T: 212.219.6014 F: 212.219.6007 Tower Research Capital, LLC 377 Broadway, 11th Fl. New York, NY 10013