From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net (William Morgan) Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 05:59:49 -0700 Subject: [sup-talk] Sup with Microsoft Exchange 2007 In-Reply-To: References: <3f81a4240904140559ubd286a5x2f026d6b875dd091@mail.gmail.com> <1240267632-sup-2023@r50p> <3f81a4240904201638v94a7dbdpce0d865cd83d8873@mail.gmail.com> <1240318807-sup-3080@entry> <3f81a4240904210642o9c74049o27e164e317d0842e@mail.gmail.com> <1240323082-sup-1515@entry> <3f81a4240904210729h74ac436bn9e1140cf7021c5ad@mail.gmail.com> <3f81a4240904210732k11366cf7naec562af54ecabac@mail.gmail.com> <1241045035-sup-1534@entry> Message-ID: <1241441484-sup-8964@entry> Reformatted excerpts from Ben Walton's message of 2009-04-30: > Since I'm back into mucking with this bit, are you open to having the > maildir scanning code move messages from new/ to cur/? This could > help with the unique id vs directory scanning issue. Would it really help? I'd be willing if so, but I don't see how. Maybe I'm missing something. I've avoided moving new/ to cur/ because I didn't see any benefit to Sup, and it conflicts with the hands-off philosophy, so it just seemed like one more thing we could screw up. But if there is a real reason to do it, I'd probably be willing. -- William