* [sup-talk] Suggestion for '.' keybinding
@ 2009-04-13 16:00 Lee Hinman
2009-04-16 19:47 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2009-04-22 15:07 ` William Morgan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lee Hinman @ 2009-04-13 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
Sup,
Since Sup already emulates vi-bindings, I was wondering if it'd be possible to
have '.' bound to "do-it-again". So if I added a label to a mail, then wanted
to apply it to a different mail, I could go to the mail and use '.' to apply
whatever the last change was. (I know I could tag all the messages ahead of
time and label them all at once, but sometimes I want to do it a different
way).
Is this possible with Sup right now? Does it store what the last action was?
(it might for the undo patch, I haven't looked at it)
- Lee
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [sup-talk] Suggestion for '.' keybinding
2009-04-13 16:00 [sup-talk] Suggestion for '.' keybinding Lee Hinman
@ 2009-04-16 19:47 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2009-04-22 15:07 ` William Morgan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Pouillard @ 2009-04-16 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
Excerpts from Lee Hinman's message of Mon Apr 13 18:00:56 +0200 2009:
> Sup,
> Since Sup already emulates vi-bindings, I was wondering if it'd be possible to
> have '.' bound to "do-it-again". So if I added a label to a mail, then wanted
> to apply it to a different mail, I could go to the mail and use '.' to apply
> whatever the last change was. (I know I could tag all the messages ahead of
> time and label them all at once, but sometimes I want to do it a different
> way).
>
> Is this possible with Sup right now? Does it store what the last action was?
> (it might for the undo patch, I haven't looked at it)
I greatly support this idea!
--
Nicolas Pouillard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [sup-talk] Suggestion for '.' keybinding
2009-04-13 16:00 [sup-talk] Suggestion for '.' keybinding Lee Hinman
2009-04-16 19:47 ` Nicolas Pouillard
@ 2009-04-22 15:07 ` William Morgan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: William Morgan @ 2009-04-22 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
Reformatted excerpts from Lee Hinman's message of 2009-04-13:
> Is this possible with Sup right now? Does it store what the last
> action was? (it might for the undo patch, I haven't looked at it)
It's not possible right now, but the undo patch does something similar
to this. The best approach might be to extend UndoManager to be able to
redo as well as undo.
--
William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-04-22 15:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-04-13 16:00 [sup-talk] Suggestion for '.' keybinding Lee Hinman
2009-04-16 19:47 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2009-04-22 15:07 ` William Morgan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox