From: nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com (Nicolas Pouillard)
Subject: [sup-talk] Read only mode for sup
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:36:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1239352575-sup-724@ausone.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1239297831-sup-5831@entry>
Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Thu Apr 09 19:30:09 +0200 2009:
> Reformatted excerpts from William Morgan's message of 2009-04-08:
> > One easy thing to comes to mind would be to have buffer-list-mode
> > (which is what you get when you hit B) sort the buffer list by last
> > access. Remap that to something like ";" and you have one-handed
> > buffer- switching with minimal keystrokes.
>
> Ok, I've done this on branch 'better-buffer-list', which I've merged
> into next. Pull and see how you guys like it. Summary:
>
> 1. 'b' rolls the buffer forward as usual.
> 2. 'B' now rolls the buffer backwards like in the olden days.
> 3. ';' pulls up the buffer list, which is now sorted by access time,
> colorized to show "system" vs non-"system" buffers, and has little
> stars for buffers with unsaved content.
> 4. '+' is now the apply-to-tagged command.
>
> Sorry for changing so many keymappings, but I really wanted ';' so that,
> with 'j' and 'k', you can swap buffers really quickly with just one
> hand. Since that freed up B, I figured I'd reenable the old behavior,
> and '+' kinda makes sense for apply-to-tagged anyways.
>
> Nicolas, I had to revert your "Buffer switching, 'bn' for the next one
> and 'bp' for the previous" change in next. I hope you're not offended! :)
I'm not offended, I just wanted to tend to more scalable bindings, where
a meaningful letter is kept to be the leading one for more advanced bindings
on a particular topic.
Moreover optimizing bindings for QUERTY keymap does not make sense for other
people... Personally I use and prefer DVORAK.
--
Nicolas Pouillard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-10 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-07 18:26 Nicolas Pouillard
2009-04-07 23:29 ` Ian Smith
2009-04-08 8:36 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2009-04-08 12:30 ` Ian Smith
2009-04-08 17:01 ` Andrew Pimlott
2009-04-08 22:18 ` William Morgan
2009-04-08 19:03 ` Wirt Wolff
2009-04-08 21:49 ` William Morgan
2009-04-09 11:55 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2009-04-09 17:30 ` William Morgan
2009-04-10 8:36 ` Nicolas Pouillard [this message]
2009-04-10 12:24 ` William Morgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1239352575-sup-724@ausone.inria.fr \
--to=nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox