From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com (Nicolas Pouillard)
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:53:02 +0200
Subject: [sup-talk] [PATCH] Resync listable_labels and applyable_labels
	with reality
In-Reply-To: <1238343951-sup-9965@entry>
References: <1237228801-sup-301@ausone.local> <1238343951-sup-9965@entry>
Message-ID: <1238345555-sup-491@ausone.local>

Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Sun Mar 29 18:30:36 +0200 2009:
> Reformatted excerpts from Nicolas Pouillard's message of 2009-03-16:
> > The listable_labels method listed all labels except unread which seems
> > an unneeded complication/restriction, so it's renamed to all_labels.
> > The applyable_labels was in fact user-defined labels so it's renamed
> > to user_defined_labels.
> 
> I've put this on branch labels-rework and merged into next. I think the
> net effect is that you'll see "unread" when you press L, which is fine.
> 
> If you want to submit a followup patch that allows users to set
> "reserved" labels via 'l', I'd consider applying it. I'm a little
> concerned that you'd see a big list like "unread, inbox, attachment,
> sent" for every single interesting message, but I think I'd rather err
> on the side of giving more power than less.

Indeed, may one can sort them to have the boring ones first?

-- 
Nicolas Pouillard