From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net (William Morgan) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 09:30:36 -0700 Subject: [sup-talk] [PATCH] Resync listable_labels and applyable_labels with reality In-Reply-To: <1237228801-sup-301@ausone.local> References: <1237228801-sup-301@ausone.local> Message-ID: <1238343951-sup-9965@entry> Reformatted excerpts from Nicolas Pouillard's message of 2009-03-16: > The listable_labels method listed all labels except unread which seems > an unneeded complication/restriction, so it's renamed to all_labels. > The applyable_labels was in fact user-defined labels so it's renamed > to user_defined_labels. I've put this on branch labels-rework and merged into next. I think the net effect is that you'll see "unread" when you press L, which is fine. If you want to submit a followup patch that allows users to set "reserved" labels via 'l', I'd consider applying it. I'm a little concerned that you'd see a big list like "unread, inbox, attachment, sent" for every single interesting message, but I think I'd rather err on the side of giving more power than less. -- William