From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com (Nicolas Pouillard) Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:29:20 +0200 Subject: [sup-talk] CCing to self mail id when composing mail In-Reply-To: <1220899449-sup-112@entry> References: <48BE7CF7.1090103@gslab.com> <1220507464-sup-1482@buckwheat> <1220899449-sup-112@entry> Message-ID: <1220902090-sup-3097@ausone.local> Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Mon Sep 08 20:47:43 +0200 2008: > Reformatted excerpts from Daniel Wagner's message of 2008-09-03: > > I don't know if this is related, but I have noticed that sup is a > > little bit too smart for itself. I sometimes also CC myself. Though > > these messages appear in my procmail.log, sup seems to recognize that > > they are a duplicate of a message already in the index, and silently > > hides them. > > Oh yeah. Sup collapses dupes. That would do it. > > That's another interesting lesson I've learned about email in the > process of writing Sup. Two messages with the same message id are more > likely than not to NOT be exactly the same message. For example, any > time you get a message both cc'ed and through a mailing list, they'll > have the same message id, but the mailing list one will probably have > extra content (ML signatures and taglines) and different headers. Do you get a conclusion, concerning email-tools design? -- Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc: not available URL: