* [sup-talk] Flat-view anyone ?
@ 2008-05-21 23:15 kingshivan at gmail.com
2008-05-25 2:39 ` William Morgan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: kingshivan at gmail.com @ 2008-05-21 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
I mentionned that idea a while back on that ml, but had no feedback, so,
here I go again.
How hard would that be to implement a flat view for thread, instead of
the tree view ? I agree that the tree makes more sense but I sometimes
miss the chronological order shown by gmail.
I read a bit through the code, and understood that thread are actually
stored as tree, would that make a flat view hard to provide ?
I'm not a ruby coder, but if it's easy to do, I'd be glad to provide a
patch (but it's always nice if I can get the work done by someone else
;-) ).
regards
--
Guillaume
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-25 2:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-05-21 23:15 [sup-talk] Flat-view anyone ? kingshivan at gmail.com
2008-05-25 2:39 ` William Morgan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox