From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: teatime@gmx.com (Jan Spakula)
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 17:04:39 -0500
Subject: [sup-talk] gpg signatures are not valid of sig present
In-Reply-To: <1211233254-sup-8091@south>
References: <1210912488-sup-826@aconcagua> <1211233254-sup-8091@south>
Message-ID: <1211234574-sup-2131@aconcagua>

Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Mon May 19 16:41:46 -0500 2008:
> Reformatted excerpts from Jan Spakula's message of 2008-05-15:
> > I've just recently discovered that gpg signatures generated by sup are
> > not verifiable (BAD signature result from gpg) on other e-mail clients
> > (tried with mutt and claws-mail), when I have nonempty signature.
> 
> Turns out this was a newline issue. I think I've tracked it down. Do a
> git pull and try again.

Works now. Thanks for the fix!

-- 
 Jan