From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: teatime@gmx.com (Jan Spakula)
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 23:42:10 -0500
Subject: [sup-talk] gpg signatures are not valid of sig present
Message-ID: <1210912488-sup-826@aconcagua>

Hello,

I've just recently discovered that gpg signatures generated by sup are
not verifiable (BAD signature result from gpg) on other e-mail clients
(tried with mutt and claws-mail), when I have nonempty signature. With
no signature present, all works fine. Sup can verify the signature
succesfully in either case though. (I'm using sup 0.5.)

I'm sorry, I'm no ruby programmer, so I don't know where the problem
could be; just by common sense it would seem that ruby strips the
message of the signature before dealing with gpg sig.

Thanks for help,

-- 
 Jan