From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: daniel@wagner-home.com (Daniel Wagner)
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 18:02:49 -0700
Subject: [sup-talk] Beginner questions
In-Reply-To: <481E5936.7040600@gmail.com>
References: <481E5936.7040600@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1209949098-sup-4287@buckwheat>

Excerpts from yanghatespam's message of Sun May 04 17:47:50 -0700 2008:
> If sup's thread-grouping is decent, then it would be neat/more accurate 
> to extend sup somehow to instead use these groupings for the filtering. 
>   I.e., if an incoming message is grouped with a thread in which I was a 
> participant, then leave it marked unread; otherwise, mark it read.

Well, sup already has a pretty nice (and similar) feature for killing
entire threads.  The '&' key will archive a thread permanently; that is,
if new mails arrive in that thread, they will automatically be archived.
So, you can hit '&' once for each thread you don't want to read; the
rest will reappear in you inbox as new mails arrive in them.

It's a bit inverted from what you want, but maybe it will do?  In any
case, if you want to extend sup, you should look at how that key works.

> (6) Scrolling through the buffer that is immediately presented to me 
> when starting sup, I only see about 3 pages of threads.  Is this 
> correct?  How do I get to the rest?

The 'M' key will load more threads.

Good luck!
~d

P.S. I'm running a slightly old version of sup, so the actual keys might
not be '&' and 'M' any more.  '?' should list the available commands at
any time.