From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: its.jeff.balogh@gmail.com (Jeff Balogh)
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:38:28 -0400
Subject: [sup-talk] [PATCH] add a reply-to hook,
	for setting the Reply To field.
In-Reply-To: <1209016094-sup-288@cabinet>
References: <1207373363-sup-374@archie> <1209014328-sup-5801@archie>
	<1209016094-sup-288@cabinet>
Message-ID: <1209047347-sup-6866@archie>

marc.hartstein wrote:
> Excerpts from its.jeff.balogh's message of Thu Apr 24 01:23:10 -0400 2008:
> > I prefer to reply to a mailing list, then all participants:
> > 
> >   $ cat .sup/hooks/reply-to.rb
> >   ([:list, :all] & types)[0]
> 
> Neat.  For reference for anybody interested in using this, possible
> values are in lib/sup/modes/reply-mode.rb:5
> 
> :sender => "Sender",
> :recipient => "Recipient",
> :all => "All",
> :list => "Mailing list",
> :user => "Customized"
> 
> The default behavior should be equivalent [see line 97] to
> ([:list, :sender, :recipient] & types)[0]

Thanks.  Your documentation skills far exceed mine. :)

> Is there a reason you ended up going with a hook?

1. Laziness.
2. Reluctance to add to config.
3. Because I expected someone might want to be fancier, maybe getting the
message for fuller processing.

> I wonder if the hook should be provided with the current message for
> fuller processing.

If you (or anyone) finds that useful, we can add it.  I left it out to keep the
hook simple.