From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marc.hartstein@alum.vassar.edu (Marc Hartstein)
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:56:00 -0400
Subject: [sup-talk] [PATCH] add a reply-to hook,
	for setting the Reply To field.
In-Reply-To: <1209014328-sup-5801@archie>
References: <1207373363-sup-374@archie> <1209014328-sup-5801@archie>
Message-ID: <1209016094-sup-288@cabinet>

Excerpts from its.jeff.balogh's message of Thu Apr 24 01:23:10 -0400 2008:
> I prefer to reply to a mailing list, then all participants:
> 
>   $ cat .sup/hooks/reply-to.rb
>   ([:list, :all] & types)[0]

Neat.  For reference for anybody interested in using this, possible
values are in lib/sup/modes/reply-mode.rb:5

:sender => "Sender",
:recipient => "Recipient",
:all => "All",
:list => "Mailing list",
:user => "Customized"

The default behavior should be equivalent [see line 97] to
([:list, :sender, :recipient] & types)[0]

Is there a reason you ended up going with a hook?

I wonder if the hook should be provided with the current message for
fuller processing.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/sup-talk/attachments/20080424/1ab3f2e6/attachment.bin