From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: vasudeva@linkswarm.com (vasudeva)
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:00:13 -0500
Subject: [sup-talk] 0.5 thoughts
In-Reply-To: <1201307782-sup-1056@tangerine.lanl.gov>
References: <1201240480-sup-1977@south> <1201267105-sup-1149@lenin>
	<1201307782-sup-1056@tangerine.lanl.gov>
Message-ID: <1201308435-sup-8242@lenin>

Excerpts from John Bent's message of Fri Jan 25 19:37:07 -0500 2008:
> Excerpts from vasudeva's message of Fri Jan 25 06:22:52 -0700 2008:
> > Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Fri Jan 25 00:59:43 -0500 2008:
> > If we're interested in 'Getting Things Done', then a nice related
> > feature might be the ability to tell sup not to exit on a 'q' keypress
> > if there are buffers open marked TODO (or whatever). One of the things I
> > like about sup is the multi-window approach, because instead of making
> > me feel *bad* about having lots of half-finished work, it makes me feel
> > as though it's reasonable I might just have it going in the background.
> > I find this mis-truth appealing.
> > 
> What is this TODO buffer you're talking about please?  Sounds useful!

Sort of random association I made. There's a neat type-A smartypants
thing called 'Getting Things Done' which seems to be a methodology
for...  getting things done. More here...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getting_Things_Done

The bit William brought up about adding 'note' objects piqued my
interest and seemed kind of GTD-ish.  Personally, I tend to use my inbox
as my TODO list, so the ability to "stick" windows -- to set sup buffers
non-volatile -- would be something I'd use a lot. As a long-time mutt
user, a certain background portion of my brain, as I navigate sup, is
devoted entirely to NOT hitting the 'q' key, which is basically muscle
memory at this point.

-- 
linkswarm.com :: Collaborative Insolence
vasudeva.linkswarm.com/gallery :: For The Faint of Heart