From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com (Nicolas Pouillard)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:51:54 +0100
Subject: [sup-talk] the proper way of determining the encoding
In-Reply-To: <1200452938-sup-9442@south>
References: <1199569265-sup-4567@clarabella.clarabella>
	<1199685831-sup-2011@south>
	<1199695733-sup-2741@clarabella.clarabella>
	<1199901555-sup-2661@south>
	<1199925510-sup-7503@clarabella.clarabella>
	<1200190710-sup-6881@south> <1200414495-sup-4477@spooky.local>
	<1200447310-sup-8536@south> <1200449354-sup-9441@ausone.local>
	<1200452148-sup-9276@south> <1200452938-sup-9442@south>
Message-ID: <1200473352-sup-5980@ausone.local>

Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Wed Jan 16 04:09:48 +0100 2008:
> Reformatted excerpts from William Morgan's message of 2008-01-15:
> > Reformatted excerpts from nicolas.pouillard's message of 2008-01-15:
> > > And I don't see your gettext patch neither on master nor on next ;( 
> > 
> > Whoops, I had never merged it onto next in the first place. Well, it's
> > on master now. Let me know if it gives you any trouble.
> 
> Aaaand merged onto next. I do seem to spend a lot of my time merging
> from master to next. I wonder if that's proper git usage. Seems to
> clutter up my pretty gitk graph.

I  don't  know  the proper git usage, but I think that you should make all you
commits  on  next,  apply all patches from users on next, and then cherry-pick
changes from next to master when they are well tested.

-- 
Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai