From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net (William Morgan) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:13:42 -0800 Subject: [sup-talk] Status of GPG support? In-Reply-To: <475DB454.5020501@therning.org> References: <475DB454.5020501@therning.org> Message-ID: <1197324612-sup-4789@south> Excerpts from Magnus Therning's message of Mon Dec 10 13:49:08 -0800 2007: > A few weeks ago there was only support for using GPG on received > messages (signature verification and I believe decryption); support > for signing and encrypting was lacking. Has this changed by now, or > are there well-known (external to sup) workarounds? Excellent timing on this question. SVN currently has a mocked-up interface for choosing sign/encrypt/sign+encrypt for each message, and as of last night I have most of the code necessary for signing outgoing messages in my local repository. It needs a little polishing but should be committed soon. (And encrypt/sign+encrypt should be pretty easy after that.) (Also, this is all gpg-specific at this point.) I will send an announcement when it's in. -- William