From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marcus-sup@bar-coded.net (Marcus Williams)
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:34:32 +0000
Subject: [sup-talk] [PATCH] Fix for before-add-message hook
In-Reply-To: <1194451347-sup-1828@tomsk>
References: <1194344471-sup-8807@tomsk> <1194400555-sup-7015@south>
	<1194451347-sup-1828@tomsk>
Message-ID: <1194452873-sup-8208@tomsk>

On 7.11.2007, Marcus Williams wrote:
> It might not be related to this change, but I'd not noticed it until
> just now. I'll see if I can reproduce it somehow.

Got it - in is_relevant you changed the patch to use "&&" instead of
"and" and I think this broke it because of the precedence of "&&"
makes it do

m.labels.include? (:inbox && ......)

whereas mine does

(m.labels.include? :inbox) and (......)

reverting back to "and" fixes it in my version.

Marcus