From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net (William Morgan) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:41:17 -0700 Subject: [sup-talk] Refreshing inbox & removing +inbox label In-Reply-To: <20071025110800.b79fe28c.alexander.panek@brainsware.org> References: <20071025110800.b79fe28c.alexander.panek@brainsware.org> Message-ID: <1193780132-sup-9314@south> Excerpts from Alexander Panek's message of Thu Oct 25 02:08:00 -0700 2007: > - Is there a way to refresh the inbox, so labels are re-read (removing > the +inbox label doesn't quite hide the threads from inbox - I have to > restart sup to make it work..)? '@' will refresh. Also, I assume you were changing the labels in thread-view-mode, which was slightly broken until recently---this should be fixed in SVN (0.2 has a bug, sigh), and everything you do in either mode should be reflected immediately in all buffers. > - Is there any easy way to hide threads from the inbox without > removing the inbox label on a per-thread basis? Something like "tag > all" threads in current view and making ";l" able to not only add, but > also remove tags would be sufficiant for me. That'd be very handy for > high traffic accounts where you actually only want to check > occasionally, without having them flooding your inbox. I'm not entirely sure I understand what you mean. What label would you remove, if you could remove from multiple threads? High-traffic mail that you only want to check occasionally should be handled by keeping them in an auto-archived source with an automatically-applied label, and then selecting that label. I read ruby-talk that way, for example. -- William