From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: stubbsd@zetani.com (David Stubbs)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 15:21:50 +0100
Subject: [sup-talk] [PATCH] New hook (enabling message filters)
In-Reply-To: <4718BCBD.2030307@quintic.co.uk>
References: <47188C6F.30008@quintic.co.uk> <4d4780f700181787@IMSS-WIN>
	<4d6e9e1600182d59@IMSS-WIN> <4718B60F.1090208@quintic.co.uk>
	<4d7f58120018376f@IMSS-WIN> <4718BCBD.2030307@quintic.co.uk>
Message-ID: <1192803670-sup-9751@DASMac.local>

Excerpts from Marcus Williams's message of Fri Oct 19 15:18:37 +0100 2007:
> On 19/10/2007 David Stubbs wrote:
> > There are a few things I want to get sorted spam filtering is one of
> >  them. I'm assuming I'll be able to use your new patch to do spam
> > filtering.
> 
> Yep, you can mark things directly as spam by adding the spam label I
> think, although I've not tried this yet. You could also kill a message
> by adding killed as a label.
> 
> So assuming your spam checker adds "SPAM" or something to the subject
> you can just do:
> 
> message.add_label "spam" if message.subj =~ /SPAM/
> 
> I think you can also use the message.raw_headers to look for specific
> headers (like X-Spam-Status if you're using spamassassin).
> 
> I'm not sure if the reserved labels like spam/killed etc can be added as
> strings or if you have to add them as symbols :spam or :killed - they're
> symbols in the code but they may get converted into strings when added
> to the index. Easy enough to test though.
> 
> Marcus
 
Funky,

I'll give it a go!