* [sup-talk] new messages don't seem to have NEW status
@ 2007-09-21 17:14 Ian Taylor
2007-09-21 18:52 ` William Morgan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Taylor @ 2007-09-21 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
I'm not sure when this started happening (maybe under a week), but any
new message I receive isn't being marked as unread or new.
I disabled all my hooks to ensure that this wasn't the problem, but no
luck.
Is this the case for anyone else? I'm using latest from svn.
--
Ian Taylor, Technical Assistant
Computer Science Computer Engineering
http://www.csce.uark.edu itaylor at uark.edu
University of Arkansas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [sup-talk] new messages don't seem to have NEW status
2007-09-21 17:14 [sup-talk] new messages don't seem to have NEW status Ian Taylor
@ 2007-09-21 18:52 ` William Morgan
2007-09-22 7:02 ` Ian Taylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: William Morgan @ 2007-09-21 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
Excerpts from Ian Taylor's message of Fri Sep 21 10:14:25 -0700 2007:
> I'm not sure when this started happening (maybe under a week), but any
> new message I receive isn't being marked as unread or new.
There was a bug with this behavior for mbox introduced in r598 that was
fixed in r590. Are you sure you're at r590?
--
William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [sup-talk] new messages don't seem to have NEW status
2007-09-21 18:52 ` William Morgan
@ 2007-09-22 7:02 ` Ian Taylor
2007-09-24 2:16 ` William Morgan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Taylor @ 2007-09-22 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Fri Sep 21 14:52:39 -0400 2007:
> Excerpts from Ian Taylor's message of Fri Sep 21 10:14:25 -0700 2007:
> > I'm not sure when this started happening (maybe under a week), but any
> > new message I receive isn't being marked as unread or new.
>
> There was a bug with this behavior for mbox introduced in r598 that was
> fixed in r590. Are you sure you're at r590?
>
Yeah, I'm r590 and it's the imap accounts, not mbox that seem to have
the problem.
--
Ian Taylor, Technical Assistant
Computer Science Computer Engineering
http://www.csce.uark.edu itaylor at uark.edu
University of Arkansas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [sup-talk] new messages don't seem to have NEW status
2007-09-22 7:02 ` Ian Taylor
@ 2007-09-24 2:16 ` William Morgan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: William Morgan @ 2007-09-24 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
Excerpts from Ian Taylor's message of Sat Sep 22 00:02:23 -0700 2007:
> Yeah, I'm r590 and it's the imap accounts, not mbox that seem to have
> the problem.
This was another bug introduced by that same revision. If you SVN
update, things should be fixed. I'm finally doing IMAP flags the "right
way", at least in that Sup understands \Seen, \Deleted and \Flagged IMAP
flags and translates them to the Sup equivalent at import time.
--
William <wmorgan-sup at masanjin.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-24 2:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-21 17:14 [sup-talk] new messages don't seem to have NEW status Ian Taylor
2007-09-21 18:52 ` William Morgan
2007-09-22 7:02 ` Ian Taylor
2007-09-24 2:16 ` William Morgan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox