From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: nevans@mdlogix.com (nicholas a. evans)
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:45:56 -0400
Subject: [sup-talk] The 'd' key, and other suggestions
In-Reply-To: <1185467966-sup-4811@mona>
References: <1185375587-sup-5023@zap.electricrain.com>
	<1185428082-sup-7118@south> <1185467966-sup-4811@mona>
Message-ID: <1185471532-sup-4914@nevans-desktop>

Excerpts from jeff.covey's message of Thu Jul 26 12:46:52 -0400 2007:
> Excerpts from William Morgan's message of Thu Jul 26 01:45:08 -0400 2007:
> 
> > Maybe you could make a case for 'D'. Do other ex-mutt users have this
> > problem? 
> 
> i do find it awkward when i'm processing my inbox and want to delete the
> thread i'm reading and move to the next new one.  i have to hit "x", "d",
> "tab", "enter", and that adds up to an annoyance after the first twenty
> times.  it would be great if one keystroke did it all.

Since we're on the subject of keybindings, my other pet peeve: "a" versus
"A", in thread-view-mode.  Because index-view-mode uses "a", I press that in
thread-view-mode expecting to have the thread archived.  For some reason, I
can never seem to remember to use "A" instead.

So, I generally do: "a", "^G", "A".
Or sometimes: "a", "^G", "x", "a".
Or sometimes: <sit... think about it... hmmm...>, "A".

Muscle memory is no good for that keybinding.  ;-)

In general, if there is a command that operates on a message from index mode
and makes sense to also operate in thread-view-mode, it would be useful if
they had the same keybinding.

-- 
Nick