From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.90.79.9 with SMTP id c9cs25522agb; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:52:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.114.149 with SMTP id e21mr38865qaq.215.1257259934565; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:52:14 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 11si173174qyk.112.2009.11.03.06.52.14; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:52:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D89B3C805A; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:52:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from everglades.pioto.org (everglades.pioto.org [207.192.69.249]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4BB15B8025 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:50:56 -0500 (EST) Received: by everglades.pioto.org (Postfix, from userid 81) id 908281602FE; Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:50:55 -0500 (EST) To: sup-talk MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:50:55 -0500 From: Mike Kelly In-Reply-To: <1257169654-sup-6224@masanjin.net> References: <1257111816-sup-4397@peray> <1257169654-sup-6224@masanjin.net> Message-ID: <02055f053011496a2dcb9085b7e7535f@localhost> X-Sender: pioto@pioto.org User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.3-stable Subject: Re: [sup-talk] Choosing a bug tracker for Sup X-BeenThere: sup-talk@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: User & developer discussion of Sup List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-talk-bounces@rubyforge.org On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:50:08 -0800, William Morgan wrote: > Nice writeup. Just brainstorming, here are the features I personally > find vital for an issue tracker that would make me happy: > > 1. Web submission. > > 2. Developer discussion via email. > > 3. Canonicality. > > 4. Browseability. > > I want a simple one. I can remember JIRA-style "ABC-123" names and > that's really handy sometimes. As much as I hate to suggest it... RT[1] should have all of these qualities. It's used by CPAN, among other things. And, a sample ticket of mine[2]. [1] http://bestpractical.com/rt [2] https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=45040 -- Mike Kelly _______________________________________________ sup-talk mailing list sup-talk@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-talk