* [sup-devel] Fwd: Re: Sup 0.10 released
@ 2010-01-25 21:19 William Morgan
2010-01-25 22:05 ` Rich Lane
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: William Morgan @ 2010-01-25 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sup-devel mailing list
I'm seeing a weird behavior with the xapian-full gem, and so is this
guy. The installation claims it fails, but it actually succeeds. The
spec file is not copied over after installation, so `gem list` doesn't
show it, but if you require 'xapian' it actually does pick up the code,
even after the failed installation.
Ideas?
--- Begin forwarded message from Andrea Fazzi ---
From: Andrea Fazzi <andrea.fazzi@alcacoop.it>
To: ruby-talk <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 05:32:10 -0500
Subject: Re: Sup 0.10 released
William Morgan wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce the release of Sup 0.10. This version is
> frickin' awesome because not only do we have Ruby 1.9 support, the
> Xapian backend is now the default! The next version will discard Ferret
> like a used rag.
I had issues installing xapian-full gem on my ubuntu box running MRI
ruby1.8. The installation fails building native extension even if it
seems that all the C stuff get compiled correctly. BTW, I solved the
issue in this way:
sudo gem install xapian-full
cd /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/xapian-full-1.1.3/
sudo rake build
sudo mv xapian-full.gemspec ../../specifications/
andrea@ubuntu-desktop:~$ irb
irb(main):001:0> require 'rubygems'
=> true
irb(main):002:0> require 'xapian'
=> true
Thanks for this great software!
Cheers,
Andrea
--- End forwarded message ---
--
William <wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net>
_______________________________________________
Sup-devel mailing list
Sup-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [sup-devel] Fwd: Re: Sup 0.10 released
2010-01-25 21:19 [sup-devel] Fwd: Re: Sup 0.10 released William Morgan
@ 2010-01-25 22:05 ` Rich Lane
2010-01-25 23:37 ` Rich Lane
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rich Lane @ 2010-01-25 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sup-devel
Excerpts from William Morgan's message of 2010-01-25 16:19:13 -0500:
> I'm seeing a weird behavior with the xapian-full gem, and so is this
> guy. The installation claims it fails, but it actually succeeds. The
> spec file is not copied over after installation, so `gem list` doesn't
> show it, but if you require 'xapian' it actually does pick up the code,
> even after the failed installation.
>
> Ideas?
This has been reported before but I haven't figured out what's going on.
I pushed the source of the xapian-full gem to git://github.com/rlane/xapian-full
in case anyone else wants to take a crack at this.
_______________________________________________
Sup-devel mailing list
Sup-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [sup-devel] Fwd: Re: Sup 0.10 released
2010-01-25 22:05 ` Rich Lane
@ 2010-01-25 23:37 ` Rich Lane
2010-01-26 0:21 ` Mark Alexander
2010-01-26 13:22 ` William Morgan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rich Lane @ 2010-01-25 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sup-devel
Excerpts from Rich Lane's message of 2010-01-25 17:05:49 -0500:
> Excerpts from William Morgan's message of 2010-01-25 16:19:13 -0500:
> > I'm seeing a weird behavior with the xapian-full gem, and so is this
> > guy. The installation claims it fails, but it actually succeeds. The
> > spec file is not copied over after installation, so `gem list` doesn't
> > show it, but if you require 'xapian' it actually does pick up the code,
> > even after the failed installation.
> >
> > Ideas?
>
> This has been reported before but I haven't figured out what's going on.
> I pushed the source of the xapian-full gem to git://github.com/rlane/xapian-full
> in case anyone else wants to take a crack at this.
I think I fixed it. Please try xapian-full 1.1.3.1 from gemcutter.
_______________________________________________
Sup-devel mailing list
Sup-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [sup-devel] Fwd: Re: Sup 0.10 released
2010-01-25 23:37 ` Rich Lane
@ 2010-01-26 0:21 ` Mark Alexander
2010-01-26 0:35 ` Rich Lane
2010-01-26 13:22 ` William Morgan
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Alexander @ 2010-01-26 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sup developer discussion
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Rich Lane <rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu> wrote:
> I think I fixed it. Please try xapian-full 1.1.3.1 from gemcutter.
Can you describe what you did to fix it? I spent several hours
trying to fix this a while back and gave up.
_______________________________________________
Sup-devel mailing list
Sup-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [sup-devel] Fwd: Re: Sup 0.10 released
2010-01-26 0:21 ` Mark Alexander
@ 2010-01-26 0:35 ` Rich Lane
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rich Lane @ 2010-01-26 0:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Alexander; +Cc: Sup developer discussion
Excerpts from Mark Alexander's message of 2010-01-25 19:21:14 -0500:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Rich Lane <rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu> wrote:
> > I think I fixed it. Please try xapian-full 1.1.3.1 from gemcutter.
>
> Can you describe what you did to fix it? I spent several hours
> trying to fix this a while back and gave up.
It turns out gem expects extconf.rb to create a Makefile, but mine was
just doing the compile itself. Gem also accepts Rakefiles for building
extensions, so I moved the code into a minimal Rakefile. I also added
the gemspec to the manifest.
_______________________________________________
Sup-devel mailing list
Sup-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [sup-devel] Fwd: Re: Sup 0.10 released
2010-01-25 23:37 ` Rich Lane
2010-01-26 0:21 ` Mark Alexander
@ 2010-01-26 13:22 ` William Morgan
2010-01-26 15:50 ` Nicolas Pouillard
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: William Morgan @ 2010-01-26 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sup-devel
Reformatted excerpts from Rich Lane's message of 2010-01-25:
> I think I fixed it. Please try xapian-full 1.1.3.1 from gemcutter.
Works great. Nice one.
I'm going to release an 0.10.2 that has deps on that and ncursesw.
--
William <wmorgan-sup@masanjin.net>
_______________________________________________
Sup-devel mailing list
Sup-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-26 15:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-25 21:19 [sup-devel] Fwd: Re: Sup 0.10 released William Morgan
2010-01-25 22:05 ` Rich Lane
2010-01-25 23:37 ` Rich Lane
2010-01-26 0:21 ` Mark Alexander
2010-01-26 0:35 ` Rich Lane
2010-01-26 13:22 ` William Morgan
2010-01-26 15:50 ` Nicolas Pouillard
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox