From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.52.236.136 with SMTP id uu8csp104659vdc; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:48:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.189.205 with SMTP id gk13mr4374310wic.25.1365886136486; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:48:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id em13si4822956wjd.248.2013.04.13.13.48.55 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:48:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jof@thejof.com) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jof@thejof.com) smtp.mail=jof@thejof.com Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id r3so2779732wey.31 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:48:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=2eCS5SRIZrWXzCUTKjYg+rP2ZZqe5co1dXNJGjuqpLU=; b=D+ekPc++T4MFlbn9MEoEca29OefJ/vLItc6mkfvwhBjwHkBtuOD3sRNyTqRgfIa52v 8l/NFc7QO/YjCrHedmldAAqmxY0WWbHobAHQEH+W8GkyWqiIYjxOC8pz6qXuIXaWqfUC 1IyLnCovfZttpmxhBRbjufEZ0xKouDUfiBSiLj1ifBCd5cLseCR5Uj2+wiGNZZ4vXm4U /su1Zq8HgHWQkbsLmPLZq0hLW2ItHnvyaSseBhfBEctLrKcLhhRjNlzM4TtjH4oqJzvo /J1TQsZs1YtH0nnN/OC4YxL5VZQoam7y7RisBq6i5gxAi54m8u6RuKeWbWrSiJF/Csdh 6+WQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.121.229 with SMTP id ln5mr24244222wjb.46.1365886135422; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:48:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.121.69 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:48:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [75.101.102.109] In-Reply-To: References: <51692285.8000709@gaute.vetsj.com> <51695AF1.2070701@gaute.vetsj.com> <5169925C.1060701@gaute.vetsj.com> <516997BD.7010409@gaute.vetsj.com> Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:48:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [sup-talk] sup: Fix for an UndefinedMethodError From: Jonathan Lassoff To: Gaute Hope Cc: Hamish D , sup-talk , Sup developer discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmRpuvXZVkWNFdE8O/Rnz9OVs+IFrthuBENhbb4SsA/nvdQ6aKWpjScQvsiT4nD4CY3wuXP Maybe William can help out? https://twitter.com/wm/status/323175493367119873 On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Gaute Hope wrote: >> If we go sup2 I would suggest the following plan: >> >> - Release the best we can get with the current code for 1.9.3 as a last >> community release of sup-0.12, say.. sup-0.13. >> >> For sup2: >> - Fork a new repo: sup2 >> - Go for Mail in stead of RMail (index breakage) >> - Go for only Psych (config breakage), requires psych gem in 1.8 >> - Integrate the IMAP / label sync back stuff (personally this is what I >> miss the most) >> - Go for ruby 2.0.0 and maybe 1.8 >> - Get rid of all dependencies that are abandoned or deprecated (ncurses >> gem..) > > And target ncursesw? > >> - Try to do tests on most stuff for different encodings >> - Try to get UTF-8 / encoding right >> - Move all the rest of the infrastructure to something the project is in >> control of >> >> Would be very nice: >> - Index migration >> - Config migration >> >> For the web page (eventually): >> - note about the original project >> - note about the last sup-0.13 release >> - wiki and project page for sup2 >> >> This plan more or less holds whether we go sup2 or not, but I think it >> is easier to get rid of the hopeless dependencies. > > I agree that it's worth it to drop unmaintained dependencies and just > fix what breaks. > It would be unfortunate to have to fork the project and make a > different name. I wonder if Morgan has lost interest or is just busy > with other things. > > Cheers, > jof >> @sup-devel readers: discussion is currently at sup-talk, please send any >> responses there. >> >> Regards, Gaute >> >> On 13. april 2013 19:14, Gaute Hope wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 13. april 2013 18:35, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: >>>> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Gaute Hope wrote: >>>>> On la. 13. april 2013 kl. 12.09 +0200, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Gaute Hope wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jonathan: I put your commit into a pull request at: >>>>>>> - https://github.com/sup-heliotrope/sup/pull/19 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also, re-branding and updating to web-references: >>>>>>> - https://github.com/sup-heliotrope/sup/pull/20 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> any comments on this? You can see the changes I made. I have absolutely >>>>>>> no intentions of stepping on any toes, but this is a suggestion. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, thank you very much! That looks great! >>>>>> >>>>>>> It is a pity that the official home page and probably first search >>>>>>> results direct to the abandoned home and gem of sup. >>>>>> >>>>>> It is too bad. Hopefully William could hand off access or at least >>>>>> push updates somehow. >>>>>> >>>>>> If not, maybe we could stand up another domain pointing to github pages? >>>>>> Looks like supmua.org and supm.ua are available. :p >>>>>> >>>>>> --j >>>>> >>>>> Yeah.. I think some web page is pretty essential, perhaps just the >>>>> standard github-pages domain for a start. Anyone feel up for the task, >>>>> I'd be happy to add you to the github-organization. >>>> >>>> Agreed. I snagged supmua.org for a year, and have it pointing at >>>> sup-heliotrope.github.io for pages. >>>> >>>> Stick me on the org, and I'll see about getting a simple site started. >>> >>> Nice. You're on. >>> >>> Cheers, Gaute >>>