From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.52.236.136 with SMTP id uu8csp103196vdc; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:19:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.157.42 with SMTP id wj10mr24244185wjb.12.1365880757656; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com [2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p8si4783402wjq.15.2013.04.13.12.19.17 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2a00:1450:400c:c03::236 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jof@thejof.com) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c03::236; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 2a00:1450:400c:c03::236 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jof@thejof.com) smtp.mail=jof@thejof.com Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id m1so687236wea.13 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:19:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=KjqvXlkWQu4Z4FSF8KqgiEpJ3zyhu1xq4SH+Fvq8hCU=; b=kd4XoJHucB2RfCyh8SN+RXAGP6rkW6dr4hxZkr5fUsVcvMZe0hKbPVoEU85Bvt91TK vco+Gtdt5Kk9PY6IHCpc7GPSApNO8m4DoYVC6j770aB6jd3Jyi9ymP4udiRcj7GzUVLm Xw4fPz4/Rc6Ce5Yfy4o40N4OYvWglmAs/GsUwmETjhzX1VWfWfY+qYAgYAWr2U/Io6dJ cY/h2S5krM+AVGyO7OrQlkVHjh7K/x8xUzMopJXY9heHxF9g1NYrSy1GDUVtHM24TzvG rcoQQVyxxcgU/XBNbOt4O8K5zyMqhPEE/DggJd+kS46szcOXlNOynvaX7oC5hcd10r63 H2xg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.57.137 with SMTP id i9mr24089270wjq.18.1365880757206; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:19:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.121.69 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:19:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [75.101.102.109] In-Reply-To: <516997BD.7010409@gaute.vetsj.com> References: <51692285.8000709@gaute.vetsj.com> <51695AF1.2070701@gaute.vetsj.com> <5169925C.1060701@gaute.vetsj.com> <516997BD.7010409@gaute.vetsj.com> Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:19:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [sup-talk] sup: Fix for an UndefinedMethodError From: Jonathan Lassoff To: Gaute Hope Cc: Hamish D , sup-talk , Sup developer discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn/gAojLfY41EL5cwILbKSsCo88dU3QE3Dmms1esXhwn7a1kogrfdDs9ZJmoZqzDit3XqpN On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Gaute Hope wrote: > If we go sup2 I would suggest the following plan: > > - Release the best we can get with the current code for 1.9.3 as a last > community release of sup-0.12, say.. sup-0.13. > > For sup2: > - Fork a new repo: sup2 > - Go for Mail in stead of RMail (index breakage) > - Go for only Psych (config breakage), requires psych gem in 1.8 > - Integrate the IMAP / label sync back stuff (personally this is what I > miss the most) > - Go for ruby 2.0.0 and maybe 1.8 > - Get rid of all dependencies that are abandoned or deprecated (ncurses > gem..) And target ncursesw? > - Try to do tests on most stuff for different encodings > - Try to get UTF-8 / encoding right > - Move all the rest of the infrastructure to something the project is in > control of > > Would be very nice: > - Index migration > - Config migration > > For the web page (eventually): > - note about the original project > - note about the last sup-0.13 release > - wiki and project page for sup2 > > This plan more or less holds whether we go sup2 or not, but I think it > is easier to get rid of the hopeless dependencies. I agree that it's worth it to drop unmaintained dependencies and just fix what breaks. It would be unfortunate to have to fork the project and make a different name. I wonder if Morgan has lost interest or is just busy with other things. Cheers, jof > @sup-devel readers: discussion is currently at sup-talk, please send any > responses there. > > Regards, Gaute > > On 13. april 2013 19:14, Gaute Hope wrote: >> >> >> On 13. april 2013 18:35, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Gaute Hope wrote: >>>> On la. 13. april 2013 kl. 12.09 +0200, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Gaute Hope wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Jonathan: I put your commit into a pull request at: >>>>>> - https://github.com/sup-heliotrope/sup/pull/19 >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, re-branding and updating to web-references: >>>>>> - https://github.com/sup-heliotrope/sup/pull/20 >>>>>> >>>>>> any comments on this? You can see the changes I made. I have absolutely >>>>>> no intentions of stepping on any toes, but this is a suggestion. >>>>> >>>>> No, thank you very much! That looks great! >>>>> >>>>>> It is a pity that the official home page and probably first search >>>>>> results direct to the abandoned home and gem of sup. >>>>> >>>>> It is too bad. Hopefully William could hand off access or at least >>>>> push updates somehow. >>>>> >>>>> If not, maybe we could stand up another domain pointing to github pages? >>>>> Looks like supmua.org and supm.ua are available. :p >>>>> >>>>> --j >>>> >>>> Yeah.. I think some web page is pretty essential, perhaps just the >>>> standard github-pages domain for a start. Anyone feel up for the task, >>>> I'd be happy to add you to the github-organization. >>> >>> Agreed. I snagged supmua.org for a year, and have it pointing at >>> sup-heliotrope.github.io for pages. >>> >>> Stick me on the org, and I'll see about getting a simple site started. >> >> Nice. You're on. >> >> Cheers, Gaute >>