From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.20.129 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1286538002-sup-2671@midna.zekjur.net>
References: <1286471713-sup-9575@midna.zekjur.net>
	<1286511449-sup-7198@zyrg.net>
	<AANLkTi=Ppaa6jA=pKOeLPEVhhqjvDg1-cS7QUsmZ+QYK@mail.gmail.com>
	<1286538002-sup-2671@midna.zekjur.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:46:28 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=ezGsXB7jHtSV1+9fREThpvPERZEOjm8TpXcVA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_=5Bsup=2Ddevel=5D_=5BPATCH=5D_Bugfix=3A_Don=E2=80=99t_display_thre?=
	=?UTF-8?Q?ad_participants_twice?=
From: Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>
To: Michael Stapelberg <michael+sup@stapelberg.de>
Cc: Sup developer discussion <sup-devel@rubyforge.org>, Rich Lane <rlane@club.cc.cmu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Michael Stapelberg
<michael+sup@stapelberg.de> wrote:
> Hi Gaute,
>
> Excerpts from Gaute Hope's message of 2010-10-08 12:05:29 +0200:
>> What if someone has the same name ? ;) Is it more
>> important/likely/intuitive than anyone using two addresses?
> If two people have exactly the same name, you would not benefit in seeing that
> same name twice, either. Even if one mail of the thread is new and one "Michael
> S." is highlighted, you still would not know which one sent the new mail. So,
> to avoid confusion about the same name showing up twice, I decided it would be
> better to not show duplicates at all.

Sure, this isn't really a big issue (for me at least). The duplicates
would be the expected behaviour (for me :)), the benefit being that
you know there is one more guy/emailaccount at work here.

Best regards, Gaute