From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.86.59.13 with SMTP id h13cs92073fga; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:39:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.81.200 with SMTP id y8mr1492323qak.234.1266921592394; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:39:52 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [205.234.109.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 2si2465848qwi.15.2010.02.23.02.39.51; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:39:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=205.234.109.19; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org designates 205.234.109.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@gmail.com Received: from rubyforge.org (rubyforge.org [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B9B18582D0; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:39:51 -0500 (EST) X-Greylist: delayed 396 seconds by postgrey-1.31 at rubyforge.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:35:58 EST Received: from mail-fx0-f228.google.com (mail-fx0-f228.google.com [209.85.220.228]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAFFE18582CA; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:35:58 -0500 (EST) Received: by fxm28 with SMTP id 28so2710213fxm.19 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:35:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:notmuch-help :notmuch-help:notmuch-help:notmuch-help:from:subject:to:in-reply-to :references; bh=J1GJMPUhnCuhZaHKacWS5qSYjNiDDFYfOIWlVimJs08=; b=n2G2fzUdth5A9nL68bMeMZlrN7/19UKbXgC9vXuJMgWN+RZuy+xBpEBMpcfrXtZD2m 9/Hjfk7+06NBfjWLwznfaI68PkZlHpiMdHc8rV+7jB+3Z4DdZIEgqvzvLK6+6HAUVQaE YCmHoVIDPL1/w1FpGlM6D1uAOAmEeHFKYGhfg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:notmuch-help:from:subject:to:in-reply-to:references; b=UIAOI7MiCKd2iuB8pL36bFRg2Bmfy7HRyEnCMU5RSS3yhJ/nu5YURGtdkZLurMJPqa Tj5FDQgriJE2yFiwYIWR2UzB1/2oQTp2n/09+JeBfg0KQ7Z9GVYsPG1ZiYqrookWmTsV MERNIXpYUq6hy2ou/pc1cL98ZipPPhtHeG5PI= Received: by 10.87.62.21 with SMTP id p21mr2117466fgk.15.1266920961222; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:29:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ks.feydakins.org [91.121.104.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d6sm11323779fga.19.2010.02.23.02.29.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:29:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4b83ae00.0637560a.7d67.ffffeca4@mx.google.com> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:29:20 -0800 (PST) Notmuch-Help: ,a - attach a file Notmuch-Help: ,s - send the message (Notmuch-Help lines will be removed) Notmuch-Help: ,q - abort the message Notmuch-Help: - skip through header lines From: Nicolas Pouillard To: Sup developer discussion , Sup developer discussion In-Reply-To: <20100222164836.GB27306@mjolnir> References: <20100222164836.GB27306@mjolnir> Subject: Re: [sup-devel] email threading - tree vs. graph X-BeenThere: sup-devel@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sup developer discussion List-Id: Sup developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: sup-devel-bounces@rubyforge.org On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:48:39 -0500, "W. Trevor King" wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 08:04:20AM -0800, Nicolas Pouillard wrote: > > ... > > Tried it (correct-mailbox.py) on a bigger part of my mail box and got: > > > > libbe.util.graph.CyclicGraphError: 17 of 1000 elements not reachable from tips > > I've moved the correct-mailbox.py/mailgraph.py bugs portion of this > thread off-list, since they are not sup-related. Feel free to send > more bugs directly to me. > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 08:38:35AM +0200, Tero Tilus wrote: > > I would love to see sup being able to do something usefull with > > multiple parent messages. > > Any more comments along this line? ;). I don't know much ruby yet, > but I can probably patch my graph code into sup if someone can tell me > where it should go (sup/graph.rb and sup/modes/thread-index-mode.rb?). I find that this is a nice idea. If it can be done without changing to much of the current code of sup, and without performance loss for those who don't want to use it, I think it could be a nice addition. Best regards, -- Nicolas Pouillard http://nicolaspouillard.fr _______________________________________________ Sup-devel mailing list Sup-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel