From: Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com>
To: Sup developer discussion <sup-devel@rubyforge.org>,
Sup developer discussion <sup-devel@rubyforge.org>
Subject: Re: [sup-devel] email threading - tree vs. graph
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:29:20 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b83ae00.0637560a.7d67.ffffeca4@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100222164836.GB27306@mjolnir>
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:48:39 -0500, "W. Trevor King" <wking@drexel.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 08:04:20AM -0800, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
> > ...
> > Tried it (correct-mailbox.py) on a bigger part of my mail box and got:
> >
> > libbe.util.graph.CyclicGraphError: 17 of 1000 elements not reachable from tips
>
> I've moved the correct-mailbox.py/mailgraph.py bugs portion of this
> thread off-list, since they are not sup-related. Feel free to send
> more bugs directly to me.
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 08:38:35AM +0200, Tero Tilus wrote:
> > I would love to see sup being able to do something usefull with
> > multiple parent messages.
>
> Any more comments along this line? ;). I don't know much ruby yet,
> but I can probably patch my graph code into sup if someone can tell me
> where it should go (sup/graph.rb and sup/modes/thread-index-mode.rb?).
I find that this is a nice idea. If it can be done without changing
to much of the current code of sup, and without performance loss for those
who don't want to use it, I think it could be a nice addition.
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Pouillard
http://nicolaspouillard.fr
_______________________________________________
Sup-devel mailing list
Sup-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-23 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-18 11:49 W. Trevor King
2010-02-21 6:38 ` Tero Tilus
2010-02-21 13:42 ` W. Trevor King
2010-02-21 17:52 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2010-02-21 19:29 ` W. Trevor King
2010-02-22 14:00 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2010-02-22 15:54 ` W. Trevor King
2010-02-22 16:04 ` Nicolas Pouillard
2010-02-22 16:48 ` W. Trevor King
2010-02-23 10:29 ` Nicolas Pouillard [this message]
2010-05-25 18:50 ` W. Trevor King
2010-06-03 4:27 ` Rich Lane
2010-06-03 10:21 ` W. Trevor King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b83ae00.0637560a.7d67.ffffeca4@mx.google.com \
--to=nicolas.pouillard@gmail.com \
--cc=sup-devel@rubyforge.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox