From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (cD572BF51.dhcp.as2116.net. [81.191.114.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id md15sm10621669lbb.28.2014.03.31.13.58.16 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Mar 2014 13:58:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Gaute Hope To: sup-devel Subject: Re: [sup-devel] use-mail branch and other work In-reply-to: <1396294116-sup-6519@kpad> References: <1396168444-sup-8010@email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at> <1396294116-sup-6519@kpad> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 22:57:06 +0200 Message-Id: <1396299131-sup-5113@qwerzila> User-Agent: Sup/git Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1396299427-17144-18358-6887-1-=" --=-1396299427-17144-18358-6887-1-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Excerpts from Matthieu Rakotojaona's message of 2014-03-31 21:42:57 +0200= : > Excerpts from Martin B=C3=A4hr's message of 2014-03-30 11:51:43 +0200: > > some ideas: > > i'd like the ability to apply a label change to all messages that= match a > > given search, not just the ones loaded into the buffer. > > > > i have imported a lot of uncategorized messages from my mutt inbox,= and i > > want to make use of sup's tagging to group them. instead of loading= all > > messages in a search with !! it would be nice to just let sup tagg = those > > messages in the background. > > Semi-answer: bin/sup-tweak-labels is this, except it's supposed to be > used from the command line. Moreover you must exit sup because the inde= x > can't be shared safely. > Since Sup is mostly targeted towards the ui and that use case happen > once in the lifetime of a user (hopefully !), I guess I'm ok with how > things are. I don't know how we could manage to reproduce the > bin/sup-tweak-labels _inside_ sup efficiently, but I'm open to the > discussion. We could do something similar to what tagging and + does now, but iterate over all the threads in the search without rendering them. Unless the chunks are loaded it is a matter of loading it from the index. It would be an extension to thread-index mode. Basically a command: Apply an action to all threads matching the current search. It will be the equivalent of: Search + show all (!!) + tag all + do action. - gaute --=-1396299427-17144-18358-6887-1-= Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTOdaiAAoJEJgnp+igdJAjhXIP+weJ7Zu962+W+L/8/zQnCRZQ u7zPfWJkWNicWzGyhlNW2TgL1Pom419PMJx3KTspV6F9t0aqGlupis/JZLfQWkHh YSzkaqt8rCbxTwdsMvvGETVZmcl0HideFkxXWhvufs9gpwl2sXEi/ve4BaodQOSK nYuEgX7pobHiCoxmeuCUb1YVWND0t7f8Ze+PGMraH9vi7bC/awDeUpp8UWAUH2Ad /Qhli87ouJC7Bxlp0gwmLHZR4TSFHuJOksHOZ4yDaa2rEsEiFsQqQ30qWPNrvJx0 aKcqOzYp9N/U7k6Jkcm4cVLmHo+KiGFs6b3Bo3AW79RoWVrx8+yfKxpHuKDhKQQk EHM6h8+5xmsIuHMrfXzXhQJQ+X7wAVydh2WH1eV8mVJ5M6HSHzuM4pQ2VyW6vqV+ 5SUGvmqVub4NjKLwq75HZjiqmN+icsg3XgB8N2rYmj6kgyuS0gZFcYWEhNuWE5ZS UydHBipGkMN0Twi+/xUu4jHl65sraCgT7Qngred2udTmMZMpP4AQ7r/08By2CwgB 6gxcoju7eJ5Mpim9RN3Z8zcCERY9elDhpOopqFdasg4eckkQ1lqcSbV/Iq3DJz+I cTLgR0WS+LH9hL8n4z9gx6MOSpw9vEwUsGRqpQREz7pb+WytxkcgBC1TX9O0EbV9 VVbXSl4AxY4tuVbcgODw =Ej1v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1396299427-17144-18358-6887-1-=--