From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>
Received: from localhost ([128.39.46.106])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m5sm55112704laj.4.2013.11.27.05.10.43
        for <sup-devel@rubyforge.org>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Wed, 27 Nov 2013 05:10:44 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From: Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>
To: sup-devel <sup-devel@rubyforge.org>
Subject: Re: [sup-devel] A maildir root source: syncing labels with maildirs (imap folders)
In-reply-to: <1385555365-sup-7389@indy.local>
References: <1385392376-sup-8491@qwerzila> <1385415206-sup-5054@qwerzila> <1385476504-sup-9378@indy.local> <1385478548-sup-9110@qwerzila> <2AC33855-6B00-42FB-9F3B-D160D8B556D4@schmeiser.org> <1385484573-sup-869@qwerzila> <1385513221-sup-4344@indy.local> <1385533106-sup-5646@qwerzila> <1385555365-sup-7389@indy.local>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:08:36 +0100
Message-Id: <1385557223-sup-3280@qwerzila>
User-Agent: Sup/git
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Excerpts from Steven Schmeiser's message of 2013-11-27 13:42:33 +0100:
> > I was thinking about changing one thing: currently messages are not
> > copied into 'archive' before it has been _no_ other labels. On GMail
> > you can still find it on the 'All mail' page on the web interface,
> > but for regular IMAP accounts that doesn't work. Should the message
> > always be copied to 'archive' when it is removed from the inbox?
> >
> > - gaute
>
> I don't have much personal preference between these two options.  The
> second option is closer to Gmail's "All Mail" folder that a lot of
> people are familiar with, so maybe that is the way to go.  Especially
> if the "copy" is a hard link that doesn't take up disk space.

I noticed Gmail does it that way in their IMAP interface (archive on no
other labels), thats why I did it. I guess it doesn't matter all that
much as long as we are all using Sup. Archive becomes a place for the
uncategorized. I don't delete an email from archive if it is already in
there, so if it at some point has been copied in there - it stays.

Copy is hard-link, but I doubt offlineimap is able to identify remote
identical emails. So hard-linking is only on the machine that the
link happened on.

- gaute