From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.96.70.73 with SMTP id k9csp23180qdu; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:50:03 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.182.34.194 with SMTP id b2mr14089911obj.41.1384098603529; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:50:03 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sy1si8825082obc.129.2013.11.10.07.50.03 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:50:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sdothum@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sdothum@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sdothum@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id e14so6088983iej.25 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:50:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sVBvtvQKC1daUvLRW5Has+f6rWOjbQS8xLps0KSdg38=; b=BR0BwQHBiQUO6ah/WRddIu9BzOLmCzBEi9+tLaW9x52cjKEc15EqkM+aW19YWyOvNw i0jrz8MuqG3lHjUm9AiawpgcNfZALn2hq+3ZboeLWa/U0A4AWF8oGGMSL9/TwV2f7mq5 BKq1WjlbDxJvxGz6cz9VWxj/AI4K1Fnp6mHSp1MDcBPQM0dotMC6uoMqglCOVaprH051 1DEgRR7WBa1XJrmBJ7ws25Ih++6t7EB1HHFJrC4ddVtNWiOIQFfiMree63ujRvMubC7C nxBfGEqpJlhkLSAYMAUUDNpVaH1Qvtrh0UGhGIxBObTtacMTbsHguzCCL1UOw7w2xv6l 5UOg== X-Received: by 10.42.70.5 with SMTP id d5mr1249754icj.39.1384098603168; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:50:03 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from localhost (dsl-173-206-16-199.tor.primus.ca. [173.206.16.199]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p5sm14008606igj.10.2013.11.10.07.50.02 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Nov 2013 07:50:02 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: Steven Hum To: Steven Hum Cc: Gaute Hope , sup-devel Subject: Re: [sup-devel] sup 0.15? In-reply-to: <1384097900-sup-2821@luna> References: <1383637745-sup-2758@qwerzila> <1384097900-sup-2821@luna> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 10:49:47 -0500 Message-Id: <1384098458-sup-7304@luna> User-Agent: Sup/git Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Edit: regarding the rmail comment.. I noticed the sup-rmail-1.0.1 gem which I presume sup-0.15.0 installed. Steven Excerpts from Steven Hum's message of 2013-11-10 10:42:00 -0500: > > Hello Gaute, > > I did a gem install of 0.15.0 on a Debian Sid system and got this error: > > > --- RuntimeError from thread: load threads for thread-index-mode > invalid source 13 > /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:237:in `block in build_message' > /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:235:in `map' > /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:235:in `build_message' > /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:161:in `block (2 levels) in each_id_by_date' > /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/thread.rb:338:in `call' > /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/thread.rb:338:in `block in load_n_threads' > /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:161:in `block in each_id_by_date' > /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:284:in `block in each_id' > /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:284:in `each' > /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:284:in `each_id' > /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/index.rb:161:in `each_id_by_date' > /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/thread.rb:334:in `load_n_threads' > /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/modes/thread_index_mode.rb:674:in `load_n_threads' > (eval):12:in `load_n_threads' > /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup/modes/thread_index_mode.rb:658:in `block in load_n_threads_background' > /var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/sup-0.15.0/lib/sup.rb:87:in `block in reporting_thread' > > > Gem version 0.14.1.1 works fine on Debian Sid (rmail did not appear to > be installed with 0.15.0 but that doesn't seem to be related to the > above error). > > Regards, > Steven > > Excerpts from Gaute Hope's message of 2013-11-05 02:51:42 -0500: > > hi there, > > > > any objections to releasing sup 0.15 (I figured it deserves a whole new > > version number!) with maildir-syncback as it is now? Is it ready to be > > released into the wild? > > > > (maildir-syncback is now in 'develop' - go ahead and test if you > > haven't) > > > > Cheers, Gaute > > > -- "Truth or die." Steven Hum 5 - 28 Gilmour St Ottawa, ON K2P 0N3 email sdothum@gmail.com tel 613.237.9058